The Culture of Inclusion vs. Profitability

Starbucks’ recent decision to crack down on non-paying visitors in its North American stores highlights a critical tension that many businesses—and startups, in particular—must navigate: the balance between creating an inclusive, welcoming space and maintaining profitability.

As Gregory Meyer’s article in the Financial Times details, Starbucks is rolling back its policy of allowing free use of its spaces, citing a need to reverse declining sales. The move has sparked debate, with critics arguing that it disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, such as the unhoused. While some customers appreciate the change, employees are now in the difficult position of enforcing it—sometimes in harsh weather conditions, where turning someone away could feel inhumane.

For startup founders and venture capital firms, this story is a cautionary tale about the cultural trade-offs that come with scaling a business. When growth is on the line, decisions that impact workplace culture and public perception can’t be taken lightly. So, what can emerging companies learn from Starbucks’ move?

1. Your Culture Is Your Brand—Until It’s Not

For years, Starbucks built its reputation on being a “third place”—a community hub where people could gather, work, and feel at home. The original policy allowing non-paying visitors was a direct response to a 2018 racial profiling incident in which two Black men were arrested at a Philadelphia Starbucks for simply waiting for a business associate. The policy change aimed to repair Starbucks’ image and reaffirm its values of inclusion.

Now, just six years later, the company is reversing course, prioritizing revenue over its open-door policy. This shift raises an important question for startups: How much of your brand identity is tied to cultural values, and what happens if business realities force a change?

If your startup positions itself as people-first, inclusive, or community-oriented, any deviation from those values will be scrutinized. That scrutiny isn’t just external—it affects employees, too. Employees at Starbucks now face the awkward and often emotional task of enforcing these new rules, which could lead to morale issues, increased turnover, and a fractured workplace culture.

2. Employee Buy-In Is Crucial for Cultural Shifts

Many startup leaders underestimate the role employees play in upholding (or resisting) cultural changes. In Starbucks’ case, baristas and store managers are now on the front lines of a shift they may not personally support. One employee quoted in the article expressed concerns about turning away unhoused individuals in cold weather, highlighting the mismatch between corporate mandates and frontline realities.

For startups, the lesson here is clear: Culture shifts don’t happen in a vacuum. If employees aren’t on board, enforcing new policies will create tension.

Before implementing any major cultural change, startups should:

• Communicate transparently about why the shift is happening.
• Involve employees in decision-making—or at least in the discussion.
• Provide clear guidelines and training to help employees navigate difficult situations.

If your team feels like they’re being asked to enforce policies that contradict their personal values, expect resistance, disengagement, and potentially negative press.

3. Balancing Inclusion with Business Realities

Startups often champion inclusivity, but being inclusive comes with operational costs. Just like Starbucks must weigh the financial impact of non-paying visitors using their space, startups need to consider how their cultural values intersect with profitability.

For example:

• Remote-first vs. Hybrid Models: A fully remote policy might align with values of flexibility and inclusion but could negatively impact team cohesion.
• Diversity Hiring Initiatives: Prioritizing diverse talent is a long-term win, but it requires an investment in equitable hiring practices and employee development.
• Unlimited PTO Policies: Great for employee well-being but can lead to ambiguity and potential burnout if not properly managed.

Starbucks’ decision reminds us that no cultural policy is set in stone—but reversing course can come at a cost. If inclusion has been part of your brand’s DNA, a pivot away from it needs to be handled with care to avoid alienating employees, customers, and investors.

Final Thoughts: How Startups Can Apply These Lessons

1. Define your cultural non-negotiables. What values are central to your brand, and which ones are flexible based on business realities?
2. Anticipate employee pushback. If a policy change affects people’s ethical or emotional boundaries, address concerns proactively.
3. Align values with financial sustainability. Being people-first doesn’t mean ignoring profitability—it means finding innovative ways to merge the two.

Starbucks’ crackdown on non-paying visitors is a stark reminder that culture isn’t just a set of feel-good ideals—it’s an evolving strategy that must align with business goals. As startups scale, leaders must ensure that cultural shifts are intentional, well-communicated, and employee-informed. Otherwise, they risk turning their greatest asset—their workplace culture—into a liability.

Article was written by John-Miguel Mitchell who is the Founder and Lead Consultant at Ekipo LLC. If you’d like to learn more about how to design and build out the ideal workplace culture for your business, email him at jmitchell@joinekipo.com.

Liked the blog? Get new content delivered directly to your inbox every Thursday & Friday.